(Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Out-of-Character

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:21 am


OOC: I don't know how to do these and I cannot do these. Sorry!
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:26 am

OOC: Maybe the only solution is to say that we have done it (like giving documents to the Court). Because I don't see other solutions XD
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:51 am

Basically I just want a record of where your ships where at at the time of the emergency, and I want a copy of the Eurussian distress signal.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:55 am

Europe and Asia wrote:Basically I just want a record of where your ships where at at the time of the emergency, and I want a copy of the Eurussian distress signal.
OOC: With no offensement, this would just be too technical and I guess the court should just rely on our formal statements and weigh the arguments on their own form, whatever it may be :-)
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:00 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Basically I just want a record of where your ships where at at the time of the emergency, and I want a copy of the Eurussian distress signal.
OOC: With no offensement, this would just be too technical and I guess the court should just rely on our formal statements and weigh the arguments on their own form, whatever it may be :-)
OOC: I agree with Eurussia Smile I mean, I understand the ratio, and, indeed, you are doing a wonderful job, but if we fall into too many technical details, I fear we will never reach the end.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:04 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:The government of New Tarajan wishes to answer to our Eurussian colleague.

First of all, the Eurussian request to receive economic damages as compensation is absurd, since they were the first ones to claim that no business was harmed by the blockade and that the ferry and air services by and from the island of Orenburg continued without problems.
Eurussia, as stated on our appeal, deserves to have a compensation of "€500 billion euros" as damages to the illegal naval blockade of New Tarajan, which was ALREADY CONFIRMED BY THIS COURT. This is a reparation to the economic losses to the local economy of the Duchy of Orenburg due to disrupted domestic and international flights, local and international ferry services, local fishing and other aquatic resources gathering, and most importantly, the psychological fears the illegal action of the aggressor caused to millions of the local population and as well as the thousands of tourists due to the naval ships surrounding our territory which of course, all armed and could lead in an eventuality of invasion.
http://s30.postimg.org/5sgbzwae9/image.png
http://s12.postimg.org/6d6jak15p/image.png
Our claims can be further attested by New Tarajan itself when it accused our government for using our very own citizens as human shields where in fact they themselves are the threats to the ever peaceful archipelago. The undeniable fact that the illegal actions of the aggressor caused concerns could be attested by the response from the Atletian Government and Stirvan tourists reporting to their own government of their shock and fears of the harassment caused by the naval vessels of New Tarajan, which will rebuke their claims that they are not in our territorial waters where in fact they have caused harassment in unprecedented levels.
About the problems in the submarine, the defense operated by Eurussia is simply a demonstration that we were right: indeed, the Shirouman and the Atletian navies knew the coordinates of the submarine, but NOT our Navy, which were not informed of the existence of this submarine route AT ALL, and which did not know of the presence of Eurussians submarines in the Shirouman Sea. It is fair to remember not only that this was the main reason for our feeling of a threat from Eurussia, but also that it is a far more serious ad dangerous behavior, in full violation of the spirit of the SOWESO Treaty and easily interpretable as an hostile action against our Kingdom.
As what we have stated as well, and as the honourable Court will attest, that the Imperial Navy is not obliged to inform the Tarajani Navy of the route of our submarine who is just simply bound to Orenburg from a goodwill visit in Shirouma as the nuclear powered submarine is in INTERNATIONAL WATERS. However, we are obliged to inform the Shiroumian Navy because the submarine is departing from their territorial waters and the Atletian Navy because our submarine will cross an uncharteredd strait with which our Imperial Navy is unsure if our vessel will cross Atletian waters as its opposite side is only a plain barbaric lands.

Finally, about the request from the Court for the signing of a Treaty between New Tarajan and Eurussia aimed to resolve our disputes, we would like to remind that, also during this trial, we tried to make contact with Moscow, taking the occasions of the presence of Chancellor Putin in Orenburg (clear provocation toward us that we ignored, in the sake of peace and respect of this Court), to ask for a meeting between the Chancellor and the King to create a first ground for negotiations, but we did not receive any response, once again. This, and their decision to ignore also our official invitation to join the International Peace Conference and to sign the Convention for the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, should be a fair demonstration of the unwillingness of Eurussia to find such a peaceful solution.
Eurussia believes that the warning from the Court of Justice that AGGRESSION FROM NEW TARAJAN should not happen again is supreme over a peace treaty and suffice enough to prevent aggressors from threatening our peace loving Eurussian Empire with which our government humbly submitted to this Court to avoid war. Furthermore, we sincerely believe that inaction to correspondences to Moscow, in which we cannot confirm neither will we confirm, is not equivalent to provocation as there is no proven response, at all.
Again, our APPEAL stands and hopes for a conclusion from this COURT.
In addition to these, Eurussia, as a responsible government for its people at the time of the tensions, will in obvious way as governments will do, will downplay any aggression to show its people that the situation is under control instead of showing of force that would surely escalate the situation further. 
Moreover, Eurussia, reserves all the rights not to opt for any talks outside the tribunal since the case is already ongoing and offering such moves cannot be regarded as an act of promoting peace while performing provocations, which the tribunal has CONFIRMED AS WELL.
Nevertheless, we await for the final verdict of the COURT.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:22 am

These last statements from Eurussia are a non-sense. Indeed, if they are true, this means that all evidences brought in front of this Court could have been falsified or fabricated ,thus rendering this trial void. For this reason, we respectfully ask the Court to take into consideration the evidences we have already provided, which clearly demonstrate that there was no harm for the business on Orenburg, and we ask to Eurussia to no offend the intelligence of our delegates and of the Court.
We have no intention to deny that the blockade was effectively in place. But we must point out that not only our ships were beyond the territorial waters of Eurussia, they were also not visibles for the population, due to the distance, and the order was specifically given by the Royal Navy to avoid excessive alarming in the population.
Consequently we reject what Eurussia said, stating that we caused "harassment in unprecedent levels". And we reject as well all requests for economic and psycological compensations: since they initially stated that there was no harm for their business, we accept their initial statement.

About previous statements of Eurussia about the Peace Treaty this Court asked for, it is clear their intentions not to negotiate, once again. They are making all what is possible to have the hands free in continuing to harm the interests and own safety of New Tarajan. Our Kingdom reacted to an entire series of provocations and insults, and this is the true reason why we are here, now, in front of this Court. If the judgement of the honourable judges wish to be effective, in order to finally resolve the dispute, negotiations are critical to achieve this noble goal. If Eurussia continues to refuse these negotiations, then, we feel obliged to ask to the Court to impose to Eurussia to not further insult and provoke our country, and to find a way of peaceful, respectful cohabitation with us.
However, we confirm our willingness to negotiate.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:31 am

New Tarajan wrote:These last statements from Eurussia are a non-sense. Indeed, if they are true, this means that all evidences brought in front of this Court could have been falsified or fabricated ,thus rendering this trial void. For this reason, we respectfully ask the Court to take into consideration the evidences we have already provided, which clearly demonstrate that there was no harm for the business on Orenburg, and we ask to Eurussia to no offend the intelligence of our delegates and of the Court.
We have no intention to deny that the blockade was effectively in place. But we must point out that not only our ships were beyond the territorial waters of Eurussia, they were also not visibles for the population, due to the distance, and the order was specifically given by the Royal Navy to avoid excessive alarming in the population.
Consequently we reject what Eurussia said, stating that we caused "harassment in unprecedent levels". And we reject as well all requests for economic and psycological compensations: since they initially stated that there was no harm for their business, we accept their initial statement.

About previous statements of Eurussia about the Peace Treaty this Court asked for, it is clear their intentions not to negotiate, once again. They are making all what is possible to have the hands free in continuing to harm the interests and own safety of New Tarajan. Our Kingdom reacted to an entire series of provocations and insults, and this is the true reason why we are here, now, in front of this Court. If the judgement of the honourable judges wish to be effective, in order to finally resolve the dispute, negotiations are critical to achieve this noble goal. If Eurussia continues to refuse these negotiations, then, we feel obliged to ask to the Court to impose to Eurussia to not further insult and provoke our country, and to find a way of peaceful, respectful cohabitation with us.
However, we confirm our willingness to negotiate.
Eurussia believes that these responses from the independent sovereign state of Atletius and as well as the tourists from Stirva will obviously reject the claims of the aggressor (New Tarajan) that they are not in the territorial waters of the Duchy of Orenburg with which we believe is already resolved as AFFIRMED BY THE COURT.
Furthermore, the ONLY ISSUES that has to be debated on these period is our APPEAL to remove the fine imposed on Eurussia by the Court and seek for compensation from New Tarajan with the justifications we have provided already right after the VERDICT OF THE COURT.
Eurussia awaits the final decision of the tribunal.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:37 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:These last statements from Eurussia are a non-sense. Indeed, if they are true, this means that all evidences brought in front of this Court could have been falsified or fabricated ,thus rendering this trial void. For this reason, we respectfully ask the Court to take into consideration the evidences we have already provided, which clearly demonstrate that there was no harm for the business on Orenburg, and we ask to Eurussia to no offend the intelligence of our delegates and of the Court.
We have no intention to deny that the blockade was effectively in place. But we must point out that not only our ships were beyond the territorial waters of Eurussia, they were also not visibles for the population, due to the distance, and the order was specifically given by the Royal Navy to avoid excessive alarming in the population.
Consequently we reject what Eurussia said, stating that we caused "harassment in unprecedent levels". And we reject as well all requests for economic and psycological compensations: since they initially stated that there was no harm for their business, we accept their initial statement.

About previous statements of Eurussia about the Peace Treaty this Court asked for, it is clear their intentions not to negotiate, once again. They are making all what is possible to have the hands free in continuing to harm the interests and own safety of New Tarajan. Our Kingdom reacted to an entire series of provocations and insults, and this is the true reason why we are here, now, in front of this Court. If the judgement of the honourable judges wish to be effective, in order to finally resolve the dispute, negotiations are critical to achieve this noble goal. If Eurussia continues to refuse these negotiations, then, we feel obliged to ask to the Court to impose to Eurussia to not further insult and provoke our country, and to find a way of peaceful, respectful cohabitation with us.
However, we confirm our willingness to negotiate.
Eurussia believes that these responses from the independent sovereign state of Atletius and as well as the tourists from Stirva will obviously reject the claims of the aggressor (New Tarajan) that they are not in the territorial waters of the Duchy of Orenburg with which we believe is already resolved as AFFIRMED BY THE COURT.
Furthermore, the ONLY ISSUES that has to be debated on these period is our APPEAL to remove the fine imposed on Eurussia by the Court and seek for compensation from New Tarajan with the justifications we have provided already right after the VERDICT OF THE COURT.
Eurussia awaits the final decision of the tribunal.
These statements are irrilevant. We never said our fleet was in Eurussian territorial waters and, since, before an evidence of the contrary, WE control our fleet, our statements are the true ones. Neither Stirva nor Atletius had, at the moment those statements were released, military vessels near Orenburg. Also, the Stirvan declarations came from a tourist, not identified, and also full of other absurd claims, such as our Fleet is capable of blocking Internet connections. Thus, these declarations are void.

New Tarajan respectfully awaits, now, the decision of the Court.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:42 am

New Tarajan wrote:
These statements are irrilevant. We never said our fleet was in Eurussian territorial waters and, since, before an evidence of the contrary, WE control our fleet, our statements are the true ones. Neither Stirva nor Atletius had, at the moment those statements were released, military vessels near Orenburg. Also, the Stirvan declarations came from a tourist, not identified, and also full of other absurd claims, such as our Fleet is capable of blocking Internet connections. Thus, these declarations are void.

New Tarajan respectfully awaits, now, the decision of the Court.
Eurussia sees these as plain, blank defensive statements.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:45 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:
These statements are irrilevant. We never said our fleet was in Eurussian territorial waters and, since, before an evidence of the contrary, WE control our fleet, our statements are the true ones. Neither Stirva nor Atletius had, at the moment those statements were released, military vessels near Orenburg. Also, the Stirvan declarations came from a tourist, not identified, and also full of other absurd claims, such as our Fleet is capable of blocking Internet connections. Thus, these declarations are void.

New Tarajan respectfully awaits, now, the decision of the Court.
Eurussia sees these as plain, blank defensive statements.
We reject these allegations. We are simply stating facts.

We submit the final decision to the Court.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:54 am

New Tarajan wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:
These statements are irrilevant. We never said our fleet was in Eurussian territorial waters and, since, before an evidence of the contrary, WE control our fleet, our statements are the true ones. Neither Stirva nor Atletius had, at the moment those statements were released, military vessels near Orenburg. Also, the Stirvan declarations came from a tourist, not identified, and also full of other absurd claims, such as our Fleet is capable of blocking Internet connections. Thus, these declarations are void.

New Tarajan respectfully awaits, now, the decision of the Court.
Eurussia sees these as plain, blank defensive statements.
We reject these allegations. We are simply stating facts.

We submit the final decision to the Court.
Again, plain, blank defensive statements and our government respectfully awaits for the consideration of this honourable tribunal to our APPEAL.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:49 am

The court requests that both parties cease bickering. A verdict is forthcoming.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:46 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:The court requests that both parties cease bickering. A verdict is forthcoming.
Eurussia respectfully abides by this honourable court's wishes and it is our greatest hope, as attested by this tribubal and our strong arguments, that aside from upholding the recent verdict, our appeal to remove the fine imposed upon Eurussia will be removed and New Tarajan shall be obliged to compensate Eurussia for 500 billion euros or more worth of damages caused by their illegal blockade as affirmed by this court 
Thank you very much!
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Tue Dec 10, 2013 6:05 am

COURT CASE EURUSSIA V NEW TARAJAN VERDICT

Justice Ivania and I thank you for your patience. The verdict will now be presented.

The court finds the sovereign nation of New Tarajan to be guilty of waging unprovoked aggression against the Empire of Great Eurussia by way of a naval blockade of its peaceful and sovereign colony Orenburg. New Tarajan violated the World Alliance Constitution, specifically the clause stating all nations have a right to national sovereignty and self determination, by blockading a Eurussian Colony. The court does not believe that the incident regarding a Eurussian submarine that suffered a nuclear malfunction is grounds for punishment as the Tarajani navy had no way of knowing, and it can only be assumed that the Tarajani navy did not recieve a distress signal as no evidence has been provided that they recieved it but refused to respond.

Thusly, for waging an unconstitutional blockade of the Eurussian Colony of Orenburg, the Court of Justice finds New Tarajan guilty of unconstitutional activity and of waging provocative activities aimed at sparking a Eurussian response. New Tarajan is hereby ordered by the Court of Justice to pay the Eurussian government a $300,000,000,000 ($300 Billion) in Euro's for damages incured on Orenburg, and for a hinderence of Eurussian trade and activity. New Tarajan is also hereby ordered to pay the World Alliance Court of Justice $100,000,000,000 ($100 Billion) for disrupting world peace and regional stability as a fine.

This case is now considered dismissed. It will be open for appeal until December 25th.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:32 am

We would like to ask to the Court what is remained of the initial verdict regarding the signing of a Peace Treaty between New Tarajan and Eurussia.
Also, we would like to know why the Court accepted the Eurussian thesis of economic reparation while we already provided full evidences that no economic damage was caused in Orenburg, under the words of Eurussia itself. Our position on the question was already well explained in our defence: Eurussia deliberatley claimed that no damage was provoked by the blockade in Orenburg. They claimed then, in response, that the statement was fabricated but, in this case, every evidence brought by Eurussia in front of this Court should be submitted to doubts, thus losing any credibility. For this reason, we respectfully ask the Court to provide an explanation on this point and to reconsider it.

Also we appeal against the amount of the fine imposed, which is completely disproportioned to the event happened. We are talking about the 0,04% of the total GDP of the Kingdom.
And we do not see any comment on the Court over the event which led to these disgraceful events and, consequently, to this trial.


Last edited by New Tarajan on Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:47 am; edited 1 time in total
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:40 am

New Tarajan wrote:We would like to ask to the Court what is remained of the initial verdict regarding the signing of a Peace Treaty between New Tarajan and Eurussia.
Also, we would like to know why the Court accepted the Eurussian thesis of economic reparation while we already provided full evidences that no economic damage was caused in Orenburg, under the words of Eurussia itself. Our position on the question was already well explained in our defence: Eurussia deliberatley claimed that no damage was provoked by the blockade in Orenburg. They claimed then, in response, that the statement was fabricated but, in this case, every evidence brought by Eurussia in front of this Court should be submitted to doubts, thus losing any credibility. For this reason, we respectfully ask the Court to provide explanation on this point and to reconsider it.

If you wish to reconsider, ask for an appeal.

Furthermore, we looked into the issue and found that fining Eurussia is counterintuitive as they did not move military forces or enforce a blockade.

Furthermore, the court will not reconsider and will enforce the verdict unless an appeal is requested.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Tue Dec 10, 2013 7:51 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:We would like to ask to the Court what is remained of the initial verdict regarding the signing of a Peace Treaty between New Tarajan and Eurussia.
Also, we would like to know why the Court accepted the Eurussian thesis of economic reparation while we already provided full evidences that no economic damage was caused in Orenburg, under the words of Eurussia itself. Our position on the question was already well explained in our defence: Eurussia deliberatley claimed that no damage was provoked by the blockade in Orenburg. They claimed then, in response, that the statement was fabricated but, in this case, every evidence brought by Eurussia in front of this Court should be submitted to doubts, thus losing any credibility. For this reason, we respectfully ask the Court to provide explanation on this point and to reconsider it.

If you wish to reconsider, ask for an appeal.

Furthermore, we looked into the issue and found that fining Eurussia is counterintuitive as they did not move military forces or enforce a blockade.

Furthermore, the court will not reconsider and will enforce the verdict unless an appeal is requested.

Very well. Consider this as an official appeal from the Kingdom of New Tarajan.
As we said before, what we request is:
1) A reconsideration of the evidences brought: we do not ask for fining Eurussia, since we agree with the opinion of the Court that it would be counterintuitive. But we will not accept to pay for damages that, prima facie the same Eurussia did not recognize.
2) Thus, we respectfully ask to the Court for a re-calculation of the total amount of the fine more proportioned to what happened and its direct, true consequences.
3) We respectfully ask to the Court to consider in the verdict the events that led to the blockade, thus implementing in the new verdict what was already expressed by this Court about the need for negotiations and the signing of an agreement between New Tarajan and Eurussia for the definitive end of their disputes and the restoration of peace and cordial relations.

(P.S.: By the way...thank you for all the time you're loosing behind this case)
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:02 am


Very well. Consider this as an official appeal from the Kingdom of New Tarajan.

As we said before, what we request is:
1) A reconsideration of the evidences brought: we do not ask for fining Eurussia, since we agree with the opinion of the Court that it would be counterintuitive. But we will not accept to pay for damages that, prima facie the same Eurussia did not recognize.
2) Thus, we respectfully ask to the Court for a re-calculation of the total amount of the fine more proportioned to what happened and its direct, true consequences.
3) We respectfully ask to the Court to consider in the verdict the events that led to the blockade, thus implementing in the new verdict what was already expressed by this Court about the need for negotiations and the signing of an agreement between New Tarajan and Eurussia for the definitive end of their disputes and the restoration of peace and cordial relations.


Eurussia respects and accepts the decision of the Court.

With regards to the appeal of New Tarajan, we believe that the latter cannot compel the Court to change its decision unless otherwise the latter could provide new proofs and not the other way around asking the Court.

And with the appeal, these are our position,

1) New Tarajan should compensate the damages it cost through its illegal blockade and furthermore should be more thankful as the tribunal lowered the compensation to 300 billion euros from 500 billion euros seeked.

2) Eurussia seeks 500 billion euros or more, actually. As the Orenburg Government would have to revive the local economy, the tourism, flights and services, and psychological debriefing to millions of local residents notwithstanding the thousands of tourists affected.

3) Eurussia believes the issue has been resolved and would even request the tribunal to uphold its previous warning on its earlier verdict ordering New Tarajan not to violate our sovereignty once more.

Our government awaits the final verdict of the Court.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:27 am

The court demands new evidence be provided or this repeal is utterly baseless and will continue ad infinitum and ad nauseum until you both receive the verdict you desire. New evidence must be out forth or this appeal will be dismissed and the case will maintain the verdict reached before this appeal.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:38 am



The court demands new evidence be provided or this repeal is utterly baseless and will continue ad infinitum and ad nauseum until you both receive the verdict you desire. New evidence must be out forth or this appeal will be dismissed and the case will maintain the verdict reached before this appeal.


Eurussia, as always, submits to this Court.

Our government is ready to debate any new evidence or new arguments, if the aggressor (New Tarajan) could produce such necessities. If there is none, we won't issue any statement and await the reinstatement of the LATEST VERDICT of this tribunal including the warning of this tribunal to New Tarajan not to violate the sovereignty of the aggrieved party, the Empire of Great Eurussia.

Nevertheless, we await the final verdict of the COURT.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:31 pm

What we are asking for is, first of all, an explanation of the reasons behind the decision of the Court to not consider the evidences already brought to its attention and to exclude from this new verdict part of what was already stated by the Court itself. Without this information, for us is impossible to further proceed.

But, more importantly, the implementation of economic damages is a clear violation of a fundamental juridical principle: affirmatio incumbit probatio. Eurussia claimed economic damages, but its delegate brought no evidences of this claim, while we provided the demonstration, under statements of the same Eurussia, that no economic damage (or, at least, an extremely limited one) could have been caused by the blockade. However, the Court accepted the Eurussian request in the verdict, and asked New Tarajan to pay a total amount of money equivalent to 0,04% of its total GDP!
Shall New Tarajan pay for economic damages denied by the prosecutor first of all?
We cannot accept this. We demonstrated to the Court our position, while Eurussia defended itself only implicitly discrediting all the evidences it brought here in favor of its position, as we already demonstrated to this Court. It is impossible to ignore these facts.
If we are obliged to pay for economic damages never evidenced, then Eurussia shall pay our Navy damages for the lies it fabricated against it. The Court already recognized that the claim against our Navy, on the issue of the submarine incident, was unjustified. Why Eurussia shall not pay reparations for a manifest lie, which aimed to discredit our Kingdom in front of the international community, since we are obliged to pay for non-existing damages? We are talking of diffamatio, which is a recognized crime, and that it is also implicitly recognized inside the verdict of this Court; and which was the real cause of the disruption of peace in the Mnemosynean continent.

We respectfully ask to the Court to reconsider all these things. Or the Kingdom of New Tarajan should be obliged to deny the validity of a trial which do not recognize fundamental juridical principles, for the sake of Justice. We know the commitment of this Court to the respect and the promotion of Law and Order. New Tarajan always supported these fundamental principles. And, for this reason, for the sake of our own coherence and dignity as a nation, we ask for this.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:49 pm

The court, first and foremost, will inform New Tarajan that denying the validity of this trial will result in much more damaging economic punishments.

Furthermore, the court will, again, explain its motives.

New Tarajan blockaded Eurussia. Illegal.

It moved military forces against an unknowing opponent. Illegal.

It disrupted world Alliance Peace. Illegal.


These are grounds for fines, and repayment to Eurussia.

The court finally requests that if New Tarajan provides evidence that the payments should be lessened, the court will proceed acordingly. Until then the verdict stands.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Dec 10, 2013 9:38 pm

We respectfully ask to the Court to reconsider all these things. Or the Kingdom of New Tarajan should be obliged to deny the validity of a trial which do not recognize fundamental juridical principles, for the sake of Justice. We know the commitment of this Court to the respect and the promotion of Law and Order. New Tarajan always supported these fundamental principles. And, for this reason, for the sake of our own coherence and dignity as a nation, we ask for this.

Not withstanding the recent honourable order of the court, Eurussia believes that New Tarajan has failed to provide new evidence nor new argument on its appeal, therefore the most recent verdict should serve as the final and executory verdict of the COURT OF JUSTICE.
Furthermore, Eurussia reminds New Tarajan that whether it honors or not the obviously IMPARTIAL handling of the tribunal on this case, the WA Constitution, as enshrined in Article 7, specifically states that this tribunal is the SOLE judicial organ of the World Alliance.
And with regards to the recent statements of the aggressor which we believe THREATS the tribunal of not recognizing its verdict and proceedings despite participating in the case from the VERY BEGINNING, Eurussia believes that these statements shall be considered as CONTEMPT OF COURT, with which our government leaves to the tribunal to ponder and decide upon whether to impose heavier compensation and fines due to these BLATANT DISRESPECT to the tribunal's SUPRANATIONAL AUTHORITY which is perfectly enshrined in Article 1 of the WA Constitution which recognizes that the supranational sovereignty of the WA Government in which the Court is part thereof.
Nevertheless, Eurussia awaits the FINAL VERDICT.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:20 pm

We wish to add to what previously stated, that we do not see in the verdict any reference to what we have described at the very beginning of this trial, reconstruting the events in front of this Court. Namely, we are talking about the fact that, BEFORE the enforcement of the blockade in the international waters surrounding Orenburg, we sent an official protest to Eurussia, as confirmed also in our news; once again we did not receive any response.
And while our Fleet was still moving, yet, once again, BEFORE the effective enforcement of the blockade, they did not answer to our requests, as stated by His Majesty the King personally.
Neither the Court answered to another part of our defence, claiming that the behavior of Eurussia was in clear violation of the spirit of the SOWESO Treaty.

These are the links to the page of the International News Network where these statements were expressed (respectively, to the first and second Tarajani news):

http://worldalliance.postalboard.com/t246p885-world-alliance-international-news-network

Finally, we wish to reiterate our loyalty to this Court and the principles it represents. However, as we stated above, it is exactly in defense of these principles that we feel obliged, right now, to proceed with this appeal, and that we seek answer for our questions. It is not possible to ignore fundamental juridical principles, and the evidences brought in front of this Court, and the real causes of the blockade around Orenburg.


About the lessening of the economic payments, we have already demonstrated to the Court the inconsistence of the Eurussian claims. If the Court is not able to recognize the complete lack of evidences of economic damages provoked by our blockade, then, we have nothing else to add.
We are ready to pay a symbolic payment to Eurussia, but nothing more.
And the Court did not yet answer to all our other statements, too.
What about the Eurussian attempt of diffamatio against the Royal Tarajan Navy?
What about the Peace Treaty?
We still wait.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 2 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum