(Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:11 am



EURUSSIA vs NEW TARAJAN

In our desire to institute a world governed by international laws and expressing our grave shock over the acceptance of this tribunal to a complaint under the case, New Tarajan vs Eurussia that despite of the lack of legal grounds much more legal basis to qualify the complaint into proceeding into a trial, specifically the absence of a citation on existing constitutional provisions nor international laws, the complaint has still given a baseless merit, with due respect to the WA Court of Justice.
Nevertheless, using the same case as a dangerous precedent, Eurussia is now obliged to defend itself, much more, all nations of the world when they are having a simple exchange of words or trading barbs against another nation despite being protected by the constitutional provision on the freedom of expression, from all the damaging statements thrown against our honourable nation by no less than, New Tarajan.

--------------------------------------------------------------

"Because this is the truth: Articmania is being used by Eurussia to pursue its own interests....but civilians are dying! Austinia is in ruin and for what? Everybody knows that a rebel movement is not like an official government: to bomb a city already hit by civil war is a crime against humanity! I do not know for how long time Moscow will continue with its lies, but the truth is that civilians are dying for no reasons. And New Tarajan will never support this, nor it will refuse to see this truth... Eurussia is destroying a country, like a plaything, and is destroying also the WAPF mission."
"The destroyers of the Royal Navy are ready to shoot down the Eurussian missiles aimed to hit positions in Texania."
"The Civil War in Texania, the death of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians under unuseful bombings, the support to a rebel group without any respect of international law.....behind all these facts, there was only one hand: the Great Empire of Eurussia... Now it is the time for Eurussia to choose what to do. Two hours ago, I ordered to the 1st Fleet of the Royal Tarajan Navy to move toward the Eurussian Duchy of Orenburg, with the aim to enforce a total blockade of the island."
"We are forced to take further actions against the Duchy of Orenburg... Order to the 1st Fleet to strenghten the blockade against the Eurussia Duchy of Orenburg halting any ship or airplance arriving or departing from it... We invite every foreign citizen to leave the Duchy... If the Eurussian government will persist in its unresponsable behavior, New Tarajan will seriously ponder further, more incivise, but necessary, actions... "
"The last trick Moscow is using against us. When we will react accordingly?"
"The Eurussian military is simply ridiculous, and can be explained only with the intention to threaten the security of all those States in the continent which oppose themselves to the policies of Moscow."
"Now we know why Eurussia did not want the intervention of the WAAF before: with the WAAF in place, they would have no claim for their imperialistic conquest."
"Eurussia actually suffers a period of bad relations, just to use an euphemism, with two key players inside the SECURS, New Tarajan and Aloia, and it is obvious they do not want our forces to be deployed not so far from their borders."
"But let me say that we were not the only one to commit a mistake: first of all, the Court...  Is Eurussia paying? They claim to be a superpower, but the reality is....that they are cowards!"


--------------------------------------------------------------

In this sense, citing the same case as mentioned above, citing its precedent, Eurussia seeks for $800 billion dollars worth of compensation and damages where each count of damaging statements shall be valued as 100 billion dollars due to its impact on our honourable nation's prestigious image before the international community. And since we have received damaging statements from high ranking officials of the Kingdom of New Tarajan, from its King, its Prime Minister, its Foreign Minister, its Admiral, its Council, and its Diet, we believe we have all the rights in seeking for a public apology.

Thank you very much.


Last edited by Great Eurussia on Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:18 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:14 am

THIS CASE AND ALL OTHER JUDICIAL ACTIONS ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE THREAD PERTAINING TO NEW TARAJAN V. EURUSSIA IS REOPENED.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Aloia on Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:46 am

OH MY GOD STOP MAKING MORE COURT CASES FOR THE SAME THING THAT IN RP TIME IS YEARS OLD
avatar
Aloia
Potential World Power

Posts : 536
Join date : 2013-02-22
Location : Kansas, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=aloia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New-Zealand on Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:12 pm

Aloia wrote:OH MY GOD STOP MAKING MORE COURT CASES FOR THE SAME THING THAT IN RP TIME IS YEARS OLD

I second this. Seriously guys, this is just getting really annoying.
avatar
New-Zealand
Emerging Power

Posts : 973
Join date : 2013-02-04
Location : New Zealand

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=new-zealand

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Jan 14, 2014 7:24 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:THIS CASE AND ALL OTHER JUDICIAL ACTIONS ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE THREAD PERTAINING TO NEW TARAJAN V. EURUSSIA IS REOPENED.

OOC: Oops! Sorry about that!
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:00 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:THIS CASE AND ALL OTHER JUDICIAL ACTIONS ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE THREAD PERTAINING TO NEW TARAJAN V. EURUSSIA IS REOPENED.

OOC: Oops! Sorry about that!

No problem, just reminding you.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Jan 14, 2014 8:53 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:THIS CASE AND ALL OTHER JUDICIAL ACTIONS ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE THREAD PERTAINING TO NEW TARAJAN V. EURUSSIA IS REOPENED.

OOC: Oops! Sorry about that!

No problem, just reminding you.


OOC: Then, I believe the case proceeds!
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:10 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:THIS CASE AND ALL OTHER JUDICIAL ACTIONS ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE THREAD PERTAINING TO NEW TARAJAN V. EURUSSIA IS REOPENED.

Eurussia asks the Court to compel New Tarajan to answer the charges.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:11 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:THIS CASE AND ALL OTHER JUDICIAL ACTIONS ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE THREAD PERTAINING TO NEW TARAJAN V. EURUSSIA IS REOPENED.

Eurussia asks the Court to compel New Tarajan to answer the charges.

The court compels Eurussia to answer the charges in New Tarajan v. Eurussia. You have until Saturday, then I'm fining you.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:07 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:THIS CASE AND ALL OTHER JUDICIAL ACTIONS ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE THREAD PERTAINING TO NEW TARAJAN V. EURUSSIA IS REOPENED.

Eurussia asks the Court to compel New Tarajan to answer the charges.

The court compels Eurussia to answer the charges in New Tarajan v. Eurussia. You have until Saturday, then I'm fining you.


Eurussia respectfully declines to honor the Court's order as it has no connection to our request in this Case. We are hoping that the recent behavior of the honourable tribunal will not compromise its expected impartiality.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:47 pm

For the moment, and until the Court will say differently, my only defense will be the following:

SERIOUSLY???

I mean, this is becoming not only annoying...but also a complete non-sense.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:56 pm

New Tarajan wrote:For the moment, and until the Court will say differently, my only defense will be the following:

SERIOUSLY???

I mean, this is becoming not only annoying...but also a complete non-sense.

Eurussia requests New Tarajan for professionalism.
Nevertheless, as New Tarajan has issued its defense, we respectfully asks the Court to issue its verdict.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:11 am

This case is hereby put into temporary hold until further notice.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:01 am

Europe and Asia wrote:This case is hereby put into temporary hold until further notice.

Eurussia asks the Court for clarification of this order.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:40 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:This case is hereby put into temporary hold until further notice.

Eurussia asks the Court for clarification of this order.

Granted. This case was placed in a sort of limbo until the other case related to this was dismissed.

Now, this court will now continue. Have both parties presented their defenses?
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:45 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:This case is hereby put into temporary hold until further notice.

Eurussia asks the Court for clarification of this order.

Granted. This case was placed in a sort of limbo until the other case related to this was dismissed.

Now, this court will now continue. Have both parties presented their defenses?

Eurussia salutes the Court for its clarification. And we believe that the defendant, New Tarajan, has already issued his defense, and our side have already issued our charges. It is our sincerest belief that the honourable tribunal can now issue its verdict. 

Thank you.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  New Tarajan on Sat Jan 18, 2014 9:58 pm

Due to the behavior assumed by Eurussia during this and previous cases in front of the Court, and firmly stating that this entire motion is simply a non-sensely farse without legal grounds, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, appealing itself to the Section 1 of the Judiciary Protocol Act, hereby REFUSES to be taken under judgement on this case.
We wish to add that this declaration does not, in any way, infringe our respect for this Honourable Court.

Thank you.
avatar
New Tarajan
Recognized Power

Posts : 1340
Join date : 2013-06-23
Location : Rome, Italy

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:39 pm

New Tarajan wrote:Due to the behavior assumed by Eurussia during this and previous cases in front of the Court, and firmly stating that this entire motion is simply a non-sensely farse without legal grounds, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, appealing itself to the Section 1 of the Judiciary Protocol Act, hereby REFUSES to be taken under judgement on this case.
We wish to add that this declaration does not, in any way, infringe our respect for this Honourable Court.

Thank you.

Motion granted. This case is dismissed.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Jan 18, 2014 10:45 pm

New Tarajan wrote:Due to the behavior assumed by Eurussia during this and previous cases in front of the Court, and firmly stating that this entire motion is simply a non-sensely farse without legal grounds, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, appealing itself to the Section 1 of the Judiciary Protocol Act, hereby REFUSES to be taken under judgement on this case.
We wish to add that this declaration does not, in any way, infringe our respect for this Honourable Court.

Thank you.

Eurussia believes that New Tarajan cannot withdraw in the trial anymore as his nation has already issued its defense and for the enlightenment of the tribunal, we are pleased to present this evidence:

New Tarajan wrote:For the moment, and until the Court will say differently, my only defense will be the following:

SERIOUSLY???

I mean, this is becoming not only annoying...but also a complete non-sense.

Hence, the argument itself is already moot as Section 1 of the Judicial Protocol Act cannot be invoked anymore since New Tarajan has already presented his initial defense, whatever its contents maybe, and it didn't even rejected the case on its first argument does in effect accepting the trial that made the tribunal continue with its handling of the case itself. Furthermore, before New Tarajan's issuance of its defense, the honourable court has already accepted the complaint into a trial.
Moreover, Eurussia believes that the purpose of having Section 1 on the Judicial Protocol Act, being the first provision of the international law, obviously guides the nations of the world to have the first step to make and that is participating in the trial without objection nor rejection just like what New Tarajan did which is contrary to its recent position to refuse in the middle of the trial in which it has participated already which is obviously inconsistent with the Judicial Protocol Act.
If the court allows New Tarajan to withdraw in the middle of the trial, it will surely set a bad precedent to future cases as it will allow nations to withdraw in the middle of a trial as they pleases thus, in effect, making the honourable tribunal's judicial power, useless.
Hence, Eurussia hopes that the honourable tribunal can now issue its verdict as both parties have already presented each others' arguments without objections nor any rejections. Thank you very much.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Sat Jan 18, 2014 11:04 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
New Tarajan wrote:Due to the behavior assumed by Eurussia during this and previous cases in front of the Court, and firmly stating that this entire motion is simply a non-sensely farse without legal grounds, the Kingdom of New Tarajan, appealing itself to the Section 1 of the Judiciary Protocol Act, hereby REFUSES to be taken under judgement on this case.
We wish to add that this declaration does not, in any way, infringe our respect for this Honourable Court.

Thank you.

Eurussia believes that New Tarajan cannot withdraw in the trial anymore as his nation has already issued its defense and for the enlightenment of the tribunal, we are pleased to present this evidence:

New Tarajan wrote:For the moment, and until the Court will say differently, my only defense will be the following:

SERIOUSLY???

I mean, this is becoming not only annoying...but also a complete non-sense.

Hence, the argument itself is already moot as Section 1 of the Judicial Protocol Act cannot be invoked anymore since New Tarajan has already presented his initial defense, whatever its contents maybe, and it didn't even rejected the case on its first argument does in effect accepting the trial that made the tribunal continue with its handling of the case itself. Furthermore, before New Tarajan's issuance of its defense, the honourable court has already accepted the complaint into a trial.
Moreover, Eurussia believes that the purpose of having Section 1 on the Judicial Protocol Act, being the first provision of the international law, obviously guides the nations of the world to have the first step to make and that is participating in the trial without objection nor rejection just like what New Tarajan did which is contrary to its recent position to refuse in the middle of the trial in which it has participated already which is obviously inconsistent with the Judicial Protocol Act.
If the court allows New Tarajan to withdraw in the middle of the trial, it will surely set a bad precedent to future cases as it will allow nations to withdraw in the middle of a trial as they pleases thus, in effect, making the honourable tribunal's judicial power, useless.
Hence, Eurussia hopes that the honourable tribunal can now issue its verdict as both parties have already presented each others' arguments without objections nor any rejections. Thank you very much.

OOC: Do you honestly think what you did in the other case didn't already set a bad precedent? I can assure you, you have significantly weakened this court by doing that. Because in case you didn't realize, all people are going to do now is go "guess I don't have to listen to them".

That said, this court dismisses this case on the grounds that it is utterly baseless. New Tarajans comments are protected by Constitution.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:20 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
OOC: Do you honestly think what you did in the other case didn't already set a bad precedent? I can assure you, you have significantly weakened this court by doing that. Because in case you didn't realize, all people are going to do now is go "guess I don't have to listen to them".

That said, this court dismisses this case on the grounds that it is utterly baseless. New Tarajans comments are protected by Constitution.  


OOC: With all due respect and reiterate that we mean no disrespect as we are just merely stating facts as usual in a court of law. Furthermore, there is no bad precedent when actions are legally guided by law. What is really bad is dismissing a case in the middle of a trial which is happening right now which we are opposing since it has no basis based on law. And again, we mean no disrespect to anyone not even Eurasia.

IC: Eurussia is deeply offended by the probable partiality of the tribunal as far as our nation is concerned on the "New Tarajan vs Eurussia" that when we invoked our constitutional rights, the tribunal has dismissed that which forced our nation to invoke our rights instead under the Judicial Protocol Act that resulted to its dismissal which are all based on law. 
And now, under this case, the tribunal is doing the other way around when it is in fact that New Tarajan has never stated any constitutional provision to become a basis for the tribunal to come up with such an unfair statement just to dismiss the case much worst in the middle of a trial already which is blatantly unacceptable.
Eurussia requests the tribunal to issue a verdict as it is the proper procedure all based on facts and law. With due respect to the court, we hope that the tribunal will prove its impartiality on this case despite these things.
Thank you.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:26 am

OOC: This is getting irritating Eurussia. You harmed the court, be it purposefully or on accident, it happened, and there's no taking it back. I'm very busy right now, I'll deal with this eventually.

IC: The court is adjourned until further notice,
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:29 am

Europe and Asia wrote:OOC: This is getting irritating Eurussia. You harmed the court, be it purposefully or on accident, it happened, and there's no taking it back. I'm very busy right now, I'll deal with this eventually.

IC: The court is adjourned until further notice,


Eurussia appreciates the court's decision. Hence, we will await for the tribunal's verdict. Thank you.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Aloia on Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:26 pm

DISMISS ALL THE CASES LIKE THIS AND IF THEY OPEN ANOTHER ONE, FINE THEM $1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
avatar
Aloia
Potential World Power

Posts : 536
Join date : 2013-02-22
Location : Kansas, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=aloia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Europe and Asia on Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:35 pm

Aloia wrote:DISMISS ALL THE CASES LIKE THIS AND IF THEY OPEN ANOTHER ONE, FINE THEM $1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

How about we fine you instead for interjecting in a court case? Please do not do that again.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Eurussia vs New Tarajan

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum