(Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Fylkirate on Sat May 03, 2014 2:01 pm

Fornnordiska Convention

Having been accepted in the WA council, The Commonwealth of Fylkirate has had the intentions of officially constructing a international waters agreement. Trade for some nations, including Fylkirate, is very important and possibly depend on it. With this treaty the council could signal when a vessel is not within international waters, allowing them to be protected by international law. The Convention brings into account the limits, territorial waters which extend to 12 miles from the baseline.

The baseline would begin either from the low-water mark or permanently exposed land of the state. The territorial waters could go up to 12 miles or less, that is depending if the chosen country wants to shorten it. Due to close neighbors and tight spots, the territorial waters can be divided at the median line of both states, it can also be defined differently if one chooses to give respected waters to an neighbor since it is not forced to extend to the 12 nautical mile limit. Archipelagos have the ability to justify internal waters which would act the same as land but with the excepting of defining and protecting justified sea-lanes (it is mandatory to define one or more sea-lanes). These lanes would be used by the international community just as in international waters but with the regulations of the coastal state. These coastal archipelago states have to claim reasonable size internal waters, if it is obviously too large, then it would not be granted as internal waters. All water bodies landward are to be classified as internal waters, over which the state has complete sovereignty: not even innocent passage is allowed. The exclusive economic zone; allowing fishing, mining, oil exploration and even pollution regulation. This economic zone would extend to 200 nautical from the baseline. Outside of the territorial waters is a ring named the contiguous zone. This would allow limited control to prevent and punish factors which could hinder or infringe on a nations customs. This has yet again a limit of 12 nautical miles, or 24 nautical miles off the baseline. Anything beyond the territorial waters is strictly international waters.

This convention is to take place at the council building but it is named after the origin of the proposition, in the capital of the The Commonwealth of Fylkirate, Fornnordiska. We hope this is going to help the international relations and diplomacy.

Schematic map of maritime zones

OOC: This is my first time and I am new to this, if there is anything wrong please tell me.


Last edited by Fylkirate on Sun May 04, 2014 2:18 am; edited 1 time in total
avatar
Fylkirate
Recognized State

Posts : 33
Join date : 2014-04-21

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=fylkirate

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat May 03, 2014 2:35 pm

Spoiler:

Fylkirate wrote:Fornnordiska Convention

Having been accepted in the WA council, The Commonwealth of Fylkirate has had the intentions of officially constructing a international waters agreement. Trade for some nations, including Fylkirate, is very important and possibly depend on it. With this treaty the council could signal when a vessel is not within international waters, allowing them to be protected by international law. The Convention brings into account the limits, territorial waters which extend to 12 miles from the baseline.

The baseline would begin either from the low-water mark or permanently exposed land of the state. The territorial waters could go up to 12 miles or less, that is depending if the chosen country wants to shorten it. Due to close neighbors and tight spots, the territorial waters can be divided at the median line of both states, it can also be defined differently if one chooses to give respected waters to an neighbor since it is not forced to extend to the 12 nautical mile limit. Archipelagos have the ability to justify internal waters which would act the same as land but with the excepting of defining and protecting justified sea-lanes (it is mandatory to define one or more sea-lanes). These lanes would be used by the international community just as in international waters but with the regulations of the coastal state. These coastal archipelago states have to claim reasonable size internal waters, if it is obviously too large, then it would not be granted as internal waters. All water bodies landward are to be classified as internal waters, over which the state has complete sovereignty: not even innocent passage is allowed. The exclusive economic zone; allowing fishing, mining, oil exploration and even pollution regulation. This economic zone would extend to 200 nautical from the baseline. Outside of the territorial waters is a ring named the contiguous zone. This would allow limited control to prevent and punish factors which could hinder or infringe on a nations customs. This has yet again a limit of 12 nautical miles, or 24 nautical miles off the baseline. Anything beyond the territorial waters is strictly international waters.

This convention is to take place at the council building but it is named after the origin of the proposition, in the capital of the The Commonwealth of Fylkirate, Fornnordiska. We hope this is going to help the international relations and diplomacy.

Schematic map of maritime zones

OOC: This is my first time and I am new to this, if there is anything wrong please tell me.

Eurussia commends Fylkirate for a wonderful and very detailed proposal for the good of international diplomacy and harmony on territorial boundaries. However, our government had already taken these matters on account which was then TRANSLATED to our RP System which resulted to thr eventual passage of the unanimously approved international law, the WA Territorial Waters Act.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Fylkirate on Sun May 04, 2014 2:16 am

I must apologize for the inconvenience, I hope that I did not waste too much of the council's time.
avatar
Fylkirate
Recognized State

Posts : 33
Join date : 2014-04-21

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=fylkirate

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Ireland on Sun May 04, 2014 2:18 am

Fylkirate wrote:I must apologize for the inconvenience, I hope that I did not waste too much of the council's time.
and please with any proposals like this put it in the Parliament
avatar
Ireland
Recognized Power

Posts : 1327
Join date : 2013-12-01
Age : 17
Location : Macon, Georgia, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_empire_of_ireland

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Fylkirate on Sun May 04, 2014 2:36 am

I will refrain from posting on the wrong board, I apologize. With that in mind, should I take this to the parliament to posdibly improve or alter the current international waters act?
avatar
Fylkirate
Recognized State

Posts : 33
Join date : 2014-04-21

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=fylkirate

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Europe and Asia on Sun May 04, 2014 4:07 am

If you feel that it is necessary, by all means take it to parliament. It does not belong in the council, however.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Fylkirate on Sun May 04, 2014 5:24 am

Europe and Asia wrote:If you feel that it is necessary, by all means take it to parliament. It does not belong in the council, however.
Understood
avatar
Fylkirate
Recognized State

Posts : 33
Join date : 2014-04-21

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=fylkirate

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Great Eurussia on Sun May 04, 2014 7:58 am

Fylkirate wrote:I will refrain from posting on the wrong board, I apologize. With that in mind, should I take this to the parliament to posdibly improve or alter the current international waters act?

Yeah, it should be in Parliament. But in the Council, being the executive, you can open up threads regarding certain discussions worth talking about and debating about the world and or the creation of future laws you think will be beneficial for the World Alliance.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Dromoda on Wed May 07, 2014 7:10 pm

Hey this inspire's me to draw a underwater map of the World alliance.

Someone wants to help?
avatar
Dromoda
Potential World Power

Posts : 783
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 22
Location : Kyongdong,Chengdao, Dromoda

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Europe and Asia on Wed May 07, 2014 7:40 pm

Underwater? What now?
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Dromoda on Wed May 07, 2014 7:44 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:Underwater? What now?

it would be cool if we could see the depths of the oceans of the world alliance
avatar
Dromoda
Potential World Power

Posts : 783
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 22
Location : Kyongdong,Chengdao, Dromoda

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed May 07, 2014 11:02 pm

Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Underwater? What now?

it would be cool if we could see the depths of the oceans of the world alliance

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Arveyres on Thu May 08, 2014 12:42 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Underwater? What now?

it would be cool if we could see the depths of the oceans of the world alliance

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D
What even
avatar
Arveyres
Potential World Power

Posts : 637
Join date : 2013-02-09
Age : 19
Location : Saint Paul, MN, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=holy_patrician_states

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Dromoda on Thu May 08, 2014 1:25 am

Arveyres wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Underwater? What now?

it would be cool if we could see the depths of the oceans of the world alliance

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D
What even

Let me dream  No
avatar
Dromoda
Potential World Power

Posts : 783
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 22
Location : Kyongdong,Chengdao, Dromoda

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Federation of Antanares on Thu May 08, 2014 1:41 am

Dromoda, do you mean a map with the elevation of the mountains and the profundity of the oceans? Because it's a cool idea Very Happy
avatar
Federation of Antanares
Potential World Power

Posts : 580
Join date : 2013-07-14
Location : Roma, Italy

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Dromoda on Thu May 08, 2014 1:43 am

Federation of Antanares wrote:Dromoda, do you mean a map with the elevation of the mountains and the profundity of the oceans? Because it's a cool idea Very Happy

its exactly what i mean.

i mean did i say something wrong?
avatar
Dromoda
Potential World Power

Posts : 783
Join date : 2013-02-06
Age : 22
Location : Kyongdong,Chengdao, Dromoda

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Arveyres on Thu May 08, 2014 1:51 am

Dromoda wrote:
Arveyres wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Dromoda wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:Underwater? What now?

it would be cool if we could see the depths of the oceans of the world alliance

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-D
What even

Let me dream  No
I was saying that to Eurussia's response :p
avatar
Arveyres
Potential World Power

Posts : 637
Join date : 2013-02-09
Age : 19
Location : Saint Paul, MN, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=holy_patrician_states

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Federation of Antanares on Thu May 08, 2014 2:42 am

Nah, it's a good idea Very Happy
avatar
Federation of Antanares
Potential World Power

Posts : 580
Join date : 2013-07-14
Location : Roma, Italy

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Great Eurussia on Fri May 09, 2014 4:24 pm

Federation of Antanares wrote:Nah, it's a good idea Very Happy

Yeah, it's a good idea of Dromoda. But I will just close my eyes and wait for it :-D
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dissmissed) Fornnordiska Convention

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum