(Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Great Eurussia on Sun Jun 22, 2014 1:07 am

Article VI ) The Council

The Council is the sole executive organ of the World Alliance composed of seven member states elected by the Parliament, from the Parliament itself, co-terminus with that Parliament subject to the confidence of that Parliament, whose member states will remain as member states of that Parliament as well. The Council can exercise any executive power at will unless otherwise prescribed by law and must be headed by the President elected by the body.

[size=45]The President cannot serve as Speaker at the same time and for successive terms.[/size]

Eurussia, as a responsible member of the WA Council, seeks the legal interpretation of the WA Court of Justice over the interpretation of Article VI of the WA Constitution with regards to the scenarios enumerated below:
1) Since the Council is elected as a whole, when a vacancy exists, can the Council allow to fill up the vacancy through those nations who joined the most recent Council election that wasn't able to gain enough votes to take a seat, which then, should fill the said vacancy?
2) Or if a vacancy exists, should the Council asks the Parliament to hold an election to fill up that vacancy? Since in anyway, the Council may be dissolved by the Parliament, at will, and eventually get re-elected anytime at the discretion of the Parliament?
Eurussia believes that the Constitution has granted the honourable tribunal the powers to interpret international laws particularly the Constitution itself. The aim of this resolution is to settle the legal hurdles to enable the important WA Council to fulfill its mandate with complete membership in accordance to the Constitution.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Europe and Asia on Mon Jun 23, 2014 12:39 am

The Council needs to have vacancies filled by act of Parliament.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Jun 23, 2014 10:25 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:The Council needs to have vacancies filled by act of Parliament.

Can you make it more like of a formal verdict? So I could add this into the archives???
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Europe and Asia on Mon Jun 23, 2014 11:20 pm

Per the World Alliance Constitution, the Council is elected through Parliament by members of Parliament. Thus, the vacancies in the Council are to be filled by the still active members of parliament until this election cycle has passed and the entire region votes on the parties.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Jun 24, 2014 5:27 pm

Europe and Asia wrote:Per the World Alliance Constitution, the Council is elected through Parliament by members of Parliament. Thus, the vacancies in the Council are to be filled by the still active members of parliament until this election cycle has passed and the entire region votes on the parties.

Are these the consensus or majority decision of the whole Court of Justice?
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Europe and Asia on Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:17 am

That is the verdict.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:23 am

Europe and Asia wrote:That is the verdict.

Eurussia wishes to know the verdict of other judges?
Isn't it required under the Revised Judicial Protocol Act?
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Europe and Asia on Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:25 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:That is the verdict.

Eurussia wishes to know the verdict of other judges?
Isn't it required under the Revised Judicial Protocol Act?

No, it is not. Per Section 3, "
It is only the head of the court can speak in behalf of the entire court provided that they all agree privately but if there is none, it is up to the court who will lead in a proceedings."
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:33 am

Europe and Asia wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
Europe and Asia wrote:That is the verdict.

Eurussia wishes to know the verdict of other judges?
Isn't it required under the Revised Judicial Protocol Act?

No, it is not. Per Section 3, "
It is only the head of the court can speak in behalf of the entire court provided that they all agree privately but if there is none, it is up to the court who will lead in a proceedings."

Please read Section 6 and Section 7.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Europe and Asia on Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:35 am

Yes, I've read them, and it says nowhere that they are required to state their opinion. The word "may" is used throughout. "May" doesn't mean "you have to." The other judges can post if or when they want to. Thank you.
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed Jun 25, 2014 12:38 am

Europe and Asia wrote:Yes, I've read them, and it says nowhere that they are required to state their opinion. The word "may" is used throughout. "May" doesn't mean "you have to." The other judges can post if or when they want to. Thank you.

Thank you.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Europe and Asia on Wed Jun 25, 2014 2:16 am

Is this case over?
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Europe and Asia on Sun Jul 20, 2014 10:51 pm

New Zealand, please change the title to "Concluded."
avatar
Europe and Asia
Emerging Power

Posts : 881
Join date : 2013-03-13
Age : 42
Location : Ann Arbor, MI

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  New-Zealand on Mon Jul 21, 2014 1:17 pm

Okay, I'll do it now.
avatar
New-Zealand
Emerging Power

Posts : 973
Join date : 2013-02-04
Location : New Zealand

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=new-zealand

Back to top Go down

Re: (Concluded) Article VI Interpretation

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum