(Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Page 9 of 12 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Mon Mar 23, 2015 6:57 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
Wirbanskia wrote:
I.S.I.S wrote:I hope I could get a seat now. Please decide on it.
Well with no conflicts I don't see why not right now.

The WA Presidency will make a ruling on the pending motions, as requested.

NOTICE

Great Eurussia wrote:VACANT SEATS at the SECURITY COUNCIL


  • ASIA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • IBERIA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • ARCADIA - secondary seat
  • ATLANTIS - primary seat, secondary seat
  • OCEANIA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • OLYMPIA - secondary seat
  • ANATOLIA - secondary seat
  • ERYTHRAEA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • MAGNESIA - 
  • POLYNESIA - secondary seat
  • PHOENICIA - secondary seat
  • MICRONESIA - secondary seat
  • MNEMOSYNE - secondary seat


RULING

Trinity Sector - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (under evaluation)
     - STATUS: Due to competition with the bid of ISIS for the same seat

ISIS - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (under evaluation)
     - 5 SC endorsements [New Korrea, Russia, Ebsotz, Snarfia, Wirbanskia]
     - 3 SC objections [Scouting, MEU, New Rhodinia]
     - 1 Non-SC objection [Xolox]
     - 1 non-SC endorsement [Trinity Sector]

     - STATUS: Due to objections and new competition with Trinity Sector

Artite - for secondary seat of Arcadia (under evaluation)
     - 4 SC endorsements [MEU, Ebsotz, Wirbanskia, Russia]
     - 1 Non-SC endorsement [Xolox]
     - 1 SC objections [New Korrea]

     - STATUS: Due to objections, pending cases, warfares, and competition with Apepistan

Apepistan - for secondary seat of Arcadia (under evaluation)
     - 5 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia, New Rhodinia, Scouting, Ebsotz, New Korrea]

     - STATUS: Due to competition with Artite

Xolox - for primary seat of Oceania (under evaluation)
     - 2 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia, Scouting]
     - 1 SC objections [New Korrea]

     - STATUS: Due to objections, pending cases, warfares

Wirbanskia - for promotion of seat of Magnesia (REJECTED)
     - 2 SC endorsements [Scouting, Ebsotz]
     - 1 Non-SC endorsement [Xolox]
     - 1 SC objections [New Korrea]

     - STATUS: The WA Presidency has no authority to promote a secondary seat.

Chackle - for a seat of Atlantis (REJECTED)
     - 1 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia]

     - STATUS: Non-determination of level of seat desired either primary or secondary
     - STATUS: Not eligible due to Sections 3 and 5 of the WASC Qualifications Act


Thank you.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Trinity Sector on Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:00 pm

I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.
avatar
Trinity Sector
Powerbroker

Posts : 211
Join date : 2015-03-03
Age : 21
Location : New York, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=trinity_sector

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  DPRNK on Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:44 pm

Trinity_Sector wrote:I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.

 I will support you!!
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Trinity Sector on Mon Mar 23, 2015 10:51 pm

Republic of New Korrea wrote:
Trinity_Sector wrote:I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.

 I will support you!!

Thanks, that's kind of you, but I believe we should both put our effort to get ISIS's future seat.


Last edited by Trinity_Sector on Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:39 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Typo)
avatar
Trinity Sector
Powerbroker

Posts : 211
Join date : 2015-03-03
Age : 21
Location : New York, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=trinity_sector

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  DPRNK on Mon Mar 23, 2015 11:24 pm

Trinity_Sector wrote:
Republic of New Korrea wrote:
Trinity_Sector wrote:I would like to drop out of the run for secondary seat. I am inexperienced for you court. I'm sorry I didn't mention this sooner.

 I will support you!!

Thanks kind of you, but I believe we should both put our effort to get ISIS's future seat.

Yeah you need a lot of support From WASC.
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Aetopolis on Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:28 am

I would like to run for the secondary seat in Mnemosyne?
avatar
Aetopolis
Sovereign State

Posts : 6
Join date : 2015-03-22

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Ebsotz on Wed Mar 25, 2015 2:19 am

I approve of Trinity Sector and the New Guy Very Happy
avatar
Ebsotz
Powerbroker

Posts : 297
Join date : 2014-10-07
Location : Southern California

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=ebsotz

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  The Holy Empire of Artite on Wed Mar 25, 2015 9:59 am

With the outcome of 3-2 (Y-N), the proposal has passed.

Zanland may now be brought into compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.

How is this passed? It was a 3-2(Y-N) when there were only five votes, 3/5=.6

.6=60% not 66% like it needs to be as stated by the laws on voting passed by this very Security Council.

Also this.

With the result of 3-2-1 (Y-A-N), the proposal has passed.

Chackle may now face compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.

3-2-1(Y-A-N)

3 yes votes out of a total of six votes.... 3/6=.5

.5=50%

Still not the required 66% as stated once more by the voting laws presented and passed by this Security Council.
avatar
The Holy Empire of Artite
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 317
Join date : 2014-09-23
Location : Some where in space with Kim Jung Un.

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Trinity Sector on Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:05 am

The Holy Empire of Artite wrote:With the outcome of 3-2 (Y-N), the proposal has passed.

Zanland may now be brought into compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.

How is this passed? It was a 3-2(Y-N) when there were only five votes, 3/5=.6

.6=60% not 66% like it needs to be as stated by the laws on voting passed by this very Security Council.

Also this.

With the result of 3-2-1 (Y-A-N), the proposal has passed.

Chackle may now face compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.

3-2-1(Y-A-N)

3 yes votes out of a total of six votes.... 3/6=.5

.5=50%

Still not the required 66% as stated once more by the voting laws presented and passed by this Security Council.
Can you direct this to its respected topic? i'm sure if you TG Eurssia he can explain it through to you.
avatar
Trinity Sector
Powerbroker

Posts : 211
Join date : 2015-03-03
Age : 21
Location : New York, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=trinity_sector

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Shockwave on Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:16 am

I would not like to see any of you guys warned so please all non-WASC members revert from posting in SC threads, you are only permitted to post here> http://worldalliance.postalboard.com/t723-wasc-global-discussions
avatar
Shockwave
Potential World Power

Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  DPRNK on Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:00 am

The Holy Empire of Artite wrote:With the outcome of 3-2 (Y-N), the proposal has passed.

Zanland may now be brought into compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.

How is this passed? It was a 3-2(Y-N) when there were only five votes, 3/5=.6

.6=60% not 66% like it needs to be as stated by the laws on voting passed by this very Security Council.

Also this.

With the result of 3-2-1 (Y-A-N), the proposal has passed.

Chackle may now face compulsory arbitration by New Korrea.

3-2-1(Y-A-N)

3 yes votes out of a total of six votes.... 3/6=.5

.5=50%

Still not the required 66% as stated once more by the voting laws presented and passed by this Security Council.


Well, all this time this has been the voting thing that the WASC is using. Why make an issue out of it just now? Why just now? With so many laws and proposals that has passed why now? This is because you are all afraid to face the guilty verdict! And all what you are doing are politically motivate just to stop the cases that is now moving forward against you all!
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:38 am

I don't mean to say anything harm against any country but raising this issue seems to be a politically motivated one because I don't see any problem on the voting system and it has been there for so long. And no one has raised a fuss about it except about these lawsuits? I guess we should just face the lawsuits and end all this for the sake of stopping New Korrea.
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Trinity Sector on Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:10 pm

Wirbanskia wrote:I would not like to see any of you guys warned so please all non-WASC members revert from posting in SC threads, you are only permitted to post here> http://worldalliance.postalboard.com/t723-wasc-global-discussions

Hey I know you mean well but, most of your comments is about argument on your bid for the primary and most of my comments was backing ISIS and reminding you that your argument was out of place. i thing were all on edge as of late to care where the post go or not.
avatar
Trinity Sector
Powerbroker

Posts : 211
Join date : 2015-03-03
Age : 21
Location : New York, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=trinity_sector

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Shockwave on Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:16 pm

Trinity_Sector wrote:
Hey I know you mean well but, most of your comments is about argument on your bid for the primary and most of my comments was backing ISIS and reminding you that your argument was out of place. i thing were all on edge as of late to care where the post go or not.
Trinity, being a non-WASC member means you cannot post here unless your trying to claim a seat or you're involved in a case, other then those you can only post in the link I provided for you if it concerns WASC matters......
avatar
Shockwave
Potential World Power

Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Trinity Sector on Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:26 pm

Wirbanskia wrote:
Trinity_Sector wrote:
Hey I know you mean well but, most of your comments is about argument on your bid for the primary and most of my comments was backing ISIS and reminding you that your argument was out of place. i thing were all on edge as of late to care where the post go or not.
Trinity, being a non-WASC member means you cannot post here unless your trying to claim a seat or you're involved in a case, other then those you can only post in the link I provided for  you if it concerns WASC matters......

i am currently on the roster for secondary if you checked Eurussia's post. Glad you finally cared after you got the big new job.
avatar
Trinity Sector
Powerbroker

Posts : 211
Join date : 2015-03-03
Age : 21
Location : New York, USA

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=trinity_sector

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Shockwave on Wed Mar 25, 2015 10:33 pm

If you noticed before as well, I started caring long before I got the "big new job".....
avatar
Shockwave
Potential World Power

Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Mar 28, 2015 2:34 pm

I.S.I.S wrote:Please decide on my seat so I know what is my fate with my seat in WASC. Thank you!

The WA Presidency will make the necessary ruling as requested.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Mar 28, 2015 3:14 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
I.S.I.S wrote:Please decide on my seat so I know what is my fate with my seat in WASC. Thank you!

The WA Presidency will make the necessary ruling as requested.

NOTICE

Great Eurussia wrote:VACANT SEATS at the SECURITY COUNCIL


  • ASIA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • IBERIA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • ARCADIA - 
  • ATLANTIS - primary seat, secondary seat
  • OCEANIA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • OLYMPIA - secondary seat
  • ANATOLIA - secondary seat
  • ERYTHRAEA - primary seat, secondary seat
  • MAGNESIA - 
  • POLYNESIA - secondary seat
  • PHOENICIA - 
  • MICRONESIA - secondary seat
  • MNEMOSYNE - secondary seat


RULING

ISIS - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (GRANTED!)

Apepistan - for secondary seat of Arcadia (GRANTED!)

Xolox - for primary seat of Oceania (under evaluation)
     - 2 SC endorsements [Wirbanskia, Scouting]
     - 1 SC objections [New Korrea]

     - STATUS: Due to objections, pending cases, warfares

Aetopolis - for secondary seat of Mnemosyne (under evaluation)
     - 1 SC endorsements [Ebsotz]

     - STATUS: New application

Trinity Sector - for secondary seat of Phoenicia (WITHDRAWN)
     - 2 SC endorsements [New Korrea, Ebsotz]

     - STATUS: Voluntary withdrawal

Artite - for secondary seat of Arcadia (REJECTED)
     - 4 SC endorsements [MEU, Ebsotz, Wirbanskia, Russia]
     - 1 Non-SC endorsement [Xolox]
     - 1 SC objections [New Korrea]

     - STATUS: Ineligible under the WA Security Council Qualifications Act


Thank you.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Kingdom of Scottlands on Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:55 pm

Congratulations to all new nations of Security Council!
avatar
Kingdom of Scottlands
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Ebsotz on Mon Mar 30, 2015 3:56 am

I endorse Xolox.
avatar
Ebsotz
Powerbroker

Posts : 297
Join date : 2014-10-07
Location : Southern California

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=ebsotz

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Juvor on Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:27 am

I would like primary seat in atlantis.
avatar
Juvor
Recognized State

Posts : 35
Join date : 2015-02-02

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Shockwave on Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:30 am

Chackle wrote:I would like primary seat in atlantis.
I endorse Chackle's bid for primary seat.
avatar
Shockwave
Potential World Power

Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Apepistan on Tue Mar 31, 2015 4:34 am

Chackle wrote:I would like primary seat in atlantis.

Apepistan endorses Chackle aswell.
avatar
Apepistan
Regional Power

Posts : 439
Join date : 2014-09-27
Location : Budapest, Hungary

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Tue Mar 31, 2015 5:11 pm

Scouting endorses Aetopolis for a secondary seat.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Apepistan on Tue Mar 31, 2015 8:10 pm

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Scouting endorses Aetopolis for a secondary seat.
The United Kingdoms of Apepistan endorse Aetopolis aswell.
avatar
Apepistan
Regional Power

Posts : 439
Join date : 2014-09-27
Location : Budapest, Hungary

Back to top Go down

Re: (Former) TENTH WA SECURITY COUNCIL

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 9 of 12 Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum