(Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Kingdom of Scottlands on Tue Dec 02, 2014 6:28 am

It is known that many wars are happening and to make sure that we can have peace we must do the following.

1) no nation of the Security Council must be involved in wars

2) if there is war in a continent, the nation representing the continent to the security council must mediate or else must be removed

3) the security council can make non-military sanction like embargo to stop the country from making war threats. All sanction must be followed by all nations.

4) the security council must take over the country making wars to replace its government with the use of military
avatar
Kingdom of Scottlands
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Dec 02, 2014 8:45 am

Republic of Scottlands wrote:It is known that many wars are happening and to make sure that we can have peace we must do the following.

1) no nation of the Security Council must be involved in wars

2) if there is war in a continent, the nation representing the continent to the security council must mediate or else must be removed

3) the security council can make non-military sanction like embargo to stop the country from making war threats. All sanction must be followed by all nations.

4) the security council must take over the country making wars to replace its government with the use of military


The proposal is open for three (3) days debate and amendments. Thereafter, a two (2) day vote will be called. Please be guided.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Tue Dec 02, 2014 10:34 am

Republic of Scottlands wrote:It is known that many wars are happening and to make sure that we can have peace we must do the following.

1) no nation of the Security Council must be involved in wars

2) if there is war in a continent, the nation representing the continent to the security council must mediate or else must be removed

3) the security council can make non-military sanction like embargo to stop the country from making war threats. All sanction must be followed by all nations.

4) the security council must take over the country making wars to replace its government with the use of military

1) I think that members of the Security Council may be in a war as long as:


  • The Security Council Member does not provoke the war declaration from the opposition.
  • The Opposition formally declares war against the WASC member.


2) I think that the WASC member for the region should mediate, but the countries at war have the right to request the full WASC to mediate, to ensure that favoritism cannot happen.

3) This point is rather pointless, as each embargo would have to be voted on individually anyway.

4) I can't really say I understand this one, a further explanation would be excellent.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Xolox on Tue Dec 02, 2014 12:52 pm

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:

4) I can't really say I understand this one, a further explanation would be excellent.

I think he means to make the aggressing state a puppet of WA while a new, less aggressive government can be formed in the country, under the WA's help. ( Probably similar to what happened to Germany after WWII. )

Anyway, Xolox is decidedly against this proposal.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  England and Wales on Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:07 pm

Against
avatar
England and Wales
Powerbroker

Posts : 287
Join date : 2014-11-02

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:28 pm

Would either of you like me to write a better version, minus #3 and #4?
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Xolox on Tue Dec 02, 2014 1:37 pm

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:Would either of you like me to write a better version, minus #3 and #4?

Honestly I have a problem with all but #2. I can imagine some bad situations cropping up without the ability to declare war. Alone, #2 isn't really significant enough to pass as a law.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Apepistan on Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:01 pm

The United Kingdoms of Apepistan would like to express their disapproval of this act.
avatar
Apepistan
Regional Power

Posts : 439
Join date : 2014-09-27
Location : Budapest, Hungary

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:41 pm

THE UNITED STATES OF SCOUTING CASTS AN AGAINST BALLOT.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Kingdom of Scottlands on Tue Dec 02, 2014 10:49 pm

Let us improve the law not just go against it. Help me
avatar
Kingdom of Scottlands
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Snarfian Federation on Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:28 am

Sorry lad, but to achieve peace we need to destroy the one not wanting it. AGAINST
avatar
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Xolox on Wed Dec 03, 2014 1:06 am

Republic of Scottlands wrote:Let us improve the law not just go against it. Help me

If you want support, maybe try to adress our qualms or modify the proposition according to them.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Azotakza on Wed Dec 03, 2014 9:57 pm

I'm against this
avatar
Azotakza
Powerbroker

Posts : 136
Join date : 2014-11-01
Age : 21

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Fri Dec 05, 2014 10:03 pm

For
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:26 pm

As the debate period lapsed, a vote is hereby called. The voting period will last for two (2) days and all uncast votes will be considered abstentions.

So far the STATUS OF VOTES are:
* Pending - (10) - Eurussia, China China, New Rhodinia, Chivalry, Articmainia, Zanland, Ebsotz, Scottlands, North Korreaa, Serenarea

* Yes - (1) - Muchos Estados Unidos

No - (3) - Xolox, Scouting, Snarfia

Abstain - (0) 


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Vote

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Dec 06, 2014 1:28 pm

Eurussia officially abstains. We support the initiative, however, the provisions are open for abuse and could violate the sovereignty of nations.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Kingdom of Scottlands on Sat Dec 06, 2014 7:00 pm

We are for peace, so we are FOR.
avatar
Kingdom of Scottlands
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Dec 09, 2014 9:55 am

The STATUS OF VOTES are:
* Yes - (3) - Muchos Estados Unidos, China China, Scottlands

No - (3) - Xolox, Scouting, Snarfia

Abstain - (8) - Eurussia, New Rhodinia, Chivalry, Articmainia, Zanland, Ebsotz, North Korreaa, Serenarea 


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.


The proposal is dismissed.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Anti-War and Pro-Peace Act

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum