(Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Xolox on Thu Jan 01, 2015 5:34 am

Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.


Last edited by Xolox on Fri Jan 02, 2015 3:36 am; edited 2 times in total
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  New Rhodinia on Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:42 am

We're honored to be a consideration. New Rhodinia is in favor.
avatar
New Rhodinia
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:44 am

Scouting is in favor.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Xolox on Thu Jan 01, 2015 10:45 am

As the author, Xolox is also in support of this amendment.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Zanland on Thu Jan 01, 2015 11:53 am

favor
avatar
Zanland
Emerging Powerbroker

Posts : 85
Join date : 2014-09-05
Location : United States

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Snarfian Federation on Thu Jan 01, 2015 6:05 pm

Snarfia is in Favor
avatar
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:13 am

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.


The legislative proposal is open for three (3) days debate and amendments.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Great Eurussia on Fri Jan 02, 2015 8:14 am

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.


Eurussia supports this inclusion to the WA Roleplaying Act.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:04 pm

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.

two (2) day vote commences.
The STATUS OF VOTES are:
* Pending - (8) - Scottlands, China China, Chivalry, Articmainia, DPRK, Ebsotz, Serenarea, MEU
           
Yes - (6) - Xolox, New Rhodinia, Scouting, Snarfia, Zanland, Eurussia

No - (0) -                    

Abstain - (0) -                     


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  DPRNK on Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:03 pm

Favor
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Serenarea on Fri Jan 09, 2015 7:11 am

Favor
avatar
Serenarea
Powerbroker

Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:09 am

Favor
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Tue Jan 13, 2015 7:43 pm

Xolox wrote:Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

---

With the passage of this amendment, I believe that another Roleplay Moderator should be chosen. I suggest New Rhodinia(assuming they don't mind), because they have not taken sides in any recent wars and from what I've seen of them, I think they can make a sensible judgement.

The STATUS OF VOTES are:
Yes - (9) - Xolox, New Rhodinia, Scouting, Snarfia, Zanland, Eurussia, China, DPRK, Serenarea

No - (0) -                    

Abstain - (5) - Scottlands, Chivalry, Articmainia, Ebsotz, MEU
                    


* NOTE: Ten votes are required for the proposal to pass.

The proposal is dismissed.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum