(Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:01 pm

A nation from the Black Raiders has arrived in the region and shortly before arriving, he posted this on the Black Raiders Message Board. I motion to banish this nation from the region on suspicion of Espionage.

avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Xolox on Wed Jan 07, 2015 10:28 pm

There's no reason to. The Riders can do literally nothing to our region and there's more than a few of their puppets here. Besides, the more members we have, the more likely we are to be seen and the more likely we are to get new members.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  New Rhodinia on Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:50 am

Xolox wrote:There's no reason to. The Riders can do literally nothing to our region and there's more than a few of their puppets here. Besides, the more members we have, the more likely we are to be seen and the more likely we are to get new members.

There's no reason not to. It's better to get rid of them and stay safe while we know now then to dismiss them as non-issues.
avatar
New Rhodinia
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Xolox on Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:53 am

New Rhodinia wrote:
Xolox wrote:There's no reason to. The Riders can do literally nothing to our region and there's more than a few of their puppets here. Besides, the more members we have, the more likely we are to be seen and the more likely we are to get new members.

There's no reason not to. It's better to get rid of them and stay safe while we know now then to dismiss them as non-issues.

There is a reason not to, I stated it in my post. It gives us publicity, the more members the better! I don't know why we shouldn't dismiss them as non-issues, because that's exactly what they are!
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  New Rhodinia on Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:58 am

Xolox wrote:
New Rhodinia wrote:
Xolox wrote:There's no reason to. The Riders can do literally nothing to our region and there's more than a few of their puppets here. Besides, the more members we have, the more likely we are to be seen and the more likely we are to get new members.

There's no reason not to. It's better to get rid of them and stay safe while we know now then to dismiss them as non-issues.

There is a reason not to, I stated it in my post. It gives us publicity, the more members the better! I don't know why we shouldn't dismiss them as non-issues, because that's exactly what they are!

We already receive regular nations in a large amount every day, and call me crazy but I don't like the idea of using raider puppet states as an advertisement for the World Alliance, a region dedicated to peace and stability.
avatar
New Rhodinia
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:19 am

New Rhodinia wrote:
Xolox wrote:
New Rhodinia wrote:
Xolox wrote:There's no reason to. The Riders can do literally nothing to our region and there's more than a few of their puppets here. Besides, the more members we have, the more likely we are to be seen and the more likely we are to get new members.

There's no reason not to. It's better to get rid of them and stay safe while we know now then to dismiss them as non-issues.

There is a reason not to, I stated it in my post. It gives us publicity, the more members the better! I don't know why we shouldn't dismiss them as non-issues, because that's exactly what they are!

We already receive regular nations in a large amount every day, and call me crazy but I don't like the idea of using raider puppet states as an advertisement for the World Alliance, a region dedicated to peace and stability.

I believe that both of you are right although New Rhodinia's reason is why I brought this up. Even if they're not visible, don't do anything, or simply collect information, I am not comfortable in having them in the region.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Great Eurussia on Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:37 pm

I beg to concur with Xolox. But if the Security Council decides otherwise, so it be.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:39 pm

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:A nation from the Black Raiders has arrived in the region and shortly before arriving, he posted this on the Black Raiders Message Board. I motion to banish this nation from the region on suspicion of Espionage.



This is an executive resolution and a five (5) days debate and voting commences.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Thu Jan 08, 2015 6:16 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:A nation from the Black Raiders has arrived in the region and shortly before arriving, he posted this on the Black Raiders Message Board. I motion to banish this nation from the region on suspicion of Espionage.



This is an executive resolution and a five (5) days debate and voting commences.

Please clarify, 5 days to debat and then vote or 5 days for debating and voting?
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Great Eurussia on Thu Jan 08, 2015 8:32 pm

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:A nation from the Black Raiders has arrived in the region and shortly before arriving, he posted this on the Black Raiders Message Board. I motion to banish this nation from the region on suspicion of Espionage.



This is an executive resolution and a five (5) days debate and voting commences.

Please clarify, 5 days to debat and then vote or 5 days for debating and voting?


For clarity, it will be a combined process for five days.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Thu Jan 08, 2015 9:22 pm

Scouting in favor.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  New Rhodinia on Fri Jan 09, 2015 3:44 am

New Rhodinia is in favor as well.
avatar
New Rhodinia
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Serenarea on Fri Jan 09, 2015 7:10 am

Serenarea is not in favor
avatar
Serenarea
Powerbroker

Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:02 am

Favor
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Zanland on Fri Jan 09, 2015 10:14 am

not in favor
avatar
Zanland
Emerging Powerbroker

Posts : 85
Join date : 2014-09-05
Location : United States

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  The Holy Empire of Artite on Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:32 pm

Why are you not in favor of banjecting a spy of the black raiders? I am just curious what makes you want to say no.
avatar
The Holy Empire of Artite
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 317
Join date : 2014-09-23
Location : Some where in space with Kim Jung Un.

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  DPRNK on Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:37 am

No
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Snarfian Federation on Mon Jan 12, 2015 4:07 am

I'm in Favor
avatar
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Thu Jan 15, 2015 11:12 pm

With 5 ayes and 3 nayes, the proposal failed to reach the 10 required number of votes. Hence, this is dismissed.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Banjection of Burnakels

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum