(Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Fri Jan 30, 2015 3:09 pm

AS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED BY: XOLOX

Pursuant to the "Emergency Measure on WASC Act Amendment" (Or more commonly known as) "WA Voting Reforms Act", which has reformed the "World Alliance Security Council Act", these voting guidelines now take effect as passed into law on 1/30/2015 at 1:31 AM (GMT-5).

"Section 3 - Functions
The WASC shall have the de facto supranational powers over the executive, legislative, and judicial matters in the WA which shall be enforced through a sixty six percent or two thirds concurrence of all its voting member states."


As recommended by the "WA Voting Reforms Act", although unofficially implemented, we're reviewing certain legislature that were dismissed due to "death by abstention".

Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.


Last edited by UnitedStatesOfScouting on Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:48 pm

Favor
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  New Rhodinia on Sat Jan 31, 2015 3:31 am

In favor. Will the original recommendation for New Rhodinia as a moderator be present in this proposal?
avatar
New Rhodinia
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Sat Jan 31, 2015 4:16 am

New Rhodinia wrote:In favor. Will the original recommendation for New Rhodinia as a moderator be present in this proposal?

As it wasn't part of the actual proposal, no. But you have my support!
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Sat Jan 31, 2015 10:10 am

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:AS ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED BY: XOLOX

Section 9 - Roleplay Integrity

This section is intended to prevent what is commonly known as "godmodding". If needed, a participant in the roleplay may request the arbitration of an unbiased or unaligned Roleplay Moderator or the Founder to settle a dispute concerning the feasibility of a battle report. The one who requests the arbitration may choose who the arbitrator is, as long as they are not involved with any side of the war or battle in question(unless the one accused agrees to this). Once the arbitrator has dealt with the issue, their judgement may not be disputed unless another unbiased or unaligned moderator exists to be appealed to. If there are no candidates for the job, the dispute may be put to vote by the Security Council.

The legislative proposal is open for three (3) days debate and amendments.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Serenarea on Sun Feb 01, 2015 4:52 am

FAVOR.
avatar
Serenarea
Powerbroker

Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Kingdom of Ireland on Sun Feb 01, 2015 4:55 am

Favor
avatar
Kingdom of Ireland
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 387
Join date : 2014-09-06
Age : 16
Location : Georgia,USA

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  DPRNK on Sun Feb 01, 2015 8:07 am

Favor
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Vote

Post  Great Eurussia on Sun Feb 01, 2015 11:19 am

Eurussia is in favor of this inclusion to the WA Roleplaying Act.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Ebsotz on Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:02 am

Favor.
avatar
Ebsotz
Powerbroker

Posts : 297
Join date : 2014-10-07
Location : Southern California

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=ebsotz

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Snarfian Federation on Mon Feb 02, 2015 10:33 pm

Favor
avatar
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:27 am

A vote is hereby called for two (2) days.
The STATUS OF VOTES are:

* Pending - (5) - Chivalry, Zanland, Scottlands, China China, Muchos Estados Unidos

* Yes - ( 8 ) - Scouting, Empire of Russia, Snarfia, Ebsotz, Serenarea, New Korrea, New Rhodinia, Great Eurussia    

* No - (0) -  

* Abstain - (0) -
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:44 am

against
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Xolox on Tue Feb 03, 2015 11:54 am

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:against

Interesting choice. I wonder if it has anything to do with the proposal being written by me.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  The Holy Empire of Artite on Tue Feb 03, 2015 12:49 pm

Xolox wrote:
Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:against

Interesting choice. I wonder if it has anything to do with the proposal being written by me.

Most likely, you see, when those who seek to put international tensions before the betterment of the WA then they really should be kicked off the WASC, this is not the place for them to promote their nation of to affect something because it was proposed by some one they do not like. MEU AND KORREA, perfect examples. They do nothing positive because they have this sense of entitlement, they think that since they are small nations that have big friends they can do what ever they want....


They think they have friends....
avatar
The Holy Empire of Artite
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 317
Join date : 2014-09-23
Location : Some where in space with Kim Jung Un.

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:24 am

The WA Presidency believes that the Security Council has been very lenient lately on allowing non-member states of the SC to voice their opinions. However, seeing that there are nations that are being disrespectful to certain WASC members and in the whole WASC itself, the WA President believes that our efforts to allow more opinions to be heard even from non-SC members are being abused and as such resorting to very undiplomatic overtures. Hence, the WA Presidency, by virtue of the WASC Act, is asking the Vice Presidency to maintain order, dequorum, and professionalism within the halls of the Security Council.

Therefore, the WA Presidency, for the sake of the integrity and dignity of the Security Council, invokes the privileges of all member states of the SC to maintain their exclusive rights of expressing opinions on matters exclusive solely to the Security Council. Therefore, diplomats from non-SC member states shall be barred from interfering in all forums and discussions of the SC, unless otherwise duly welcomed and invited, without opposition.

Thus, non-member states may opt to privately discuss with SC member states, to lobby or speak on their behalf before the Security Council. If they wish to initiate talks of any matter, the WA Affairs Dialogue Subforum is the only place expected to be and should be and non-SC members have all the freedom to invite SC members on those fora and exchange of discussions.

So ordered.

(If there is a conflicting law, that regulation shall prevail.)


OOC: It is my grave disappointment for nations not to realize that being a member state of the SC is a privilege and exercising such privilege rests SOLELY on those nations in the Security Council, regardless of how other nations view those actions and react on its repercussions. It is also a common sense that SC members deserve the respect necessary as SC members, regardless of their political views or actions within the SC. And critics of certain SC members may have all the freedom to initiate rhetoric against their opponents outside the halls of the SC, however, as civilized sovereign states, non-SC members were never granted the privilege nor right to disrespect any member state of the SC much more within the SC halls itself.



Thus, the VP may request for the immediate deletion of non-member state's posts on any thread of the Security Council. We apologize for any inconvenience, but we find this action necessary for the integrity of the Security Council.



Thank you.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Wed Feb 04, 2015 6:31 am

Great Eurussia wrote:
The WA Presidency believes that the Security Council has been very lenient lately on allowing non-member states of the SC to voice their opinions. However, seeing that there are nations that are being disrespectful to certain WASC members and in the whole WASC itself, the WA President believes that our efforts to allow more opinions to be heard even from non-SC members are being abused and as such resorting to very undiplomatic overtures. Hence, the WA Presidency, by virtue of the WASC Act, is asking the Vice Presidency to maintain order, dequorum, and professionalism within the halls of the Security Council.
Therefore, the WA Presidency, for the sake of the integrity and dignity of the Security Council, invokes the privileges of all member states of the SC to maintain their exclusive rights of expressing opinions on matters exclusive solely to the Security Council. Therefore, diplomats from non-SC member states shall be barred from interfering in all forums and discussions of the SC, unless otherwise duly welcomed and invited, without opposition.
Thus, non-member states may opt to privately discuss with SC member states, to lobby or speak on their behalf before the Security Council. If they wish to initiate talks of any matter, the WA Affairs Dialogue Subforum is the only place expected to be and should be and non-SC members have all the freedom to invite SC members on those fora and exchange of discussions.
So ordered.
(If there is a conflicting law, that regulation shall prevail.)

OOC: It is my grave disappointment for nations not to realize that being a member state of the SC is a privilege and exercising such privilege rests SOLELY on those nations in the Security Council, regardless of how other nations view those actions and react on its repercussions. It is also a common sense that SC members deserve the respect necessary as SC members, regardless of their political views or actions within the SC. And critics of certain SC members may have all the freedom to initiate rhetoric against their opponents outside the halls of the SC, however, as civilized sovereign states, non-SC members were never granted the privilege nor right to disrespect any member state of the SC much more within the SC halls itself.


Thus, the VP may request for the immediate deletion of non-member state's posts on any thread of the Security Council. We apologize for any inconvenience, but we find this action necessary for the integrity of the Security Council.


Thank you.

OOC: Acknowledged. Taking steps to combat this.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Wed Feb 04, 2015 6:35 am

The Holy Empire of Artite wrote:
Xolox wrote:
Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:against

Interesting choice. I wonder if it has anything to do with the proposal being written by me.

Most likely, you see, when those who seek to put international tensions before the betterment of the WA then they really should be kicked off the WASC, this is not the place for them to promote their nation of to affect something because it was proposed by some one they do not like. MEU AND KORREA, perfect examples. They do nothing positive because they have this sense of entitlement, they think that since they are small nations that have big friends they can do what ever they want....


They think they have friends....

Xolox wrote:
Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:against

Interesting choice. I wonder if it has anything to do with the proposal being written by me.


Please move these opinions to your appropriate WASC Continent thread if you wish to keep these posts. You have 6 Hours.

Furthermore, please keep in mind to hold a respectful manner towards members of the WASC. We are required to take in your input into considering our vote in matters, however this doesn't mean that we should be verbally assaulted. Thank You.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Kingdom of Scottlands on Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:04 pm

Scottish Republic is a neutral country. But seeing the good intention of the proposal, I am in favour.
avatar
Kingdom of Scottlands
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Thu Feb 05, 2015 1:51 pm

* Pending - (3) - Chivalry, Zanland, China China

* Yes - (9) - Scouting, Empire of Russia, Snarfia, Ebsotz, Serenarea, New Korrea, New Rhodinia, Great Eurussia, Scottlands      

* No - (1) - Muchos Estados Unidos

* Abstain - (0) -

After a 9 - 1 Vote, this proposal is hereby PASSED! We will see to it that Eurussia edit it officially and send out a region-wide message about this. However, as of the time of this posting, the law is in effect!
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Passed) WA Roleplaying Act Amendment

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum