(Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

View previous topic View next topic Go down

(Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:23 pm

I am asking WASC to ban Xolox from Security Council because of his declaration of war. He do not deserve to be in WASC, he is a plain war maker. He is even involved recently with a fight with Scouting over the Vice President seat.
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Xolox on Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:32 pm

Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:34 pm

Xolox wrote:Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.

I know. But nation like yours who is fighting with countries just because of a seat in WASC doesnt deserve to be in WASC. You do not also deserve to get a seat in WASC because you are declaring war for no reason and just because you like it. You are a destroyer of peace in this region.
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Xolox on Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:44 pm

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:
Xolox wrote:Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.

I know. But nation like yours who is fighting with countries just because of a seat in WASC doesnt deserve to be in WASC. You do not also deserve to get a seat in WASC because you are declaring war for no reason and just because you like it. You are a destroyer of peace in this region.

I am not declaring war for any of those reasons. I am declaring war because I was called into doing so by multiple alliances.
avatar
Xolox
Regional Power

Posts : 470
Join date : 2014-09-04
Age : 19
Location : Florida

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=xolox

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Wed Feb 25, 2015 12:44 pm

Xolox wrote:
Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:
Xolox wrote:Please pay more attention to world news. I have not been on the WASC for weeks now. The struggle was not over the Vice Presidency, it was over the Delegacy of the region.

I know. But nation like yours who is fighting with countries just because of a seat in WASC doesnt deserve to be in WASC. You do not also deserve to get a seat in WASC because you are declaring war for no reason and just because you like it. You are a destroyer of peace in this region.

I am not declaring war for any of those reasons. I am declaring war because I was called into doing so by multiple alliances.

It is the same thing. Don't make pitiful excuses.
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Wed Feb 25, 2015 2:12 pm

Please clarify if your intentions were to remove Xolox from the WASC or to ban him from returning?
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Position

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:11 pm

The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.

If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.

We will notify the council for any change of vote.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:13 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.
If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.
We will notify the council for any change of vote.

May I ask what exactly you're voting on here? It still hasn't been clarified of what intentions this proposal holds, hence technically the discussion/voting phase hasn't been opened until that can be cleared up.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Clarification

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:15 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:
The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.
If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.
We will notify the council for any change of vote.

The same stance applies to Muchos Estados Unidos.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Great Eurussia on Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:16 pm

UnitedStatesOfScouting wrote:
Great Eurussia wrote:
The Eurussian Government believes that the Republic of New Korrea has not initiated any provocations against the Grand Empire of Xolox, thus a sudden declaration of war is condemnable and an uprovoked aggression and as well as a clear violation of the WA Security Council Act. However, Eurussia will maintain its abstention at the moment since we believe that Xolox was only bound by its obligations with its allies which could still change in time.
If Xolox will continue its unprovoked aggression and commits an attack against New Korrea, Eurussia will be voting in favor of the resolution. However, if Xolox decides not to pursue its unprovoked aggression against New Korrea, Eurussia will vote against the resolution.
We will notify the council for any change of vote.

May I ask what exactly you're voting on here? It still hasn't been clarified of what intentions this proposal holds, hence technically the discussion/voting phase hasn't been opened until that can be cleared up.

We can clearly see the intentions of the proposal.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Shockwave on Wed Feb 25, 2015 11:21 pm

Hey MEU, do you know who else declared war on you? Me, Artite, Xolox,

Same with you Korea.

Don't just pin it on Xolox. How about you accept your responsibilities and go along with this conflict. Do nations IRL stop and think *oh yah we did violate that rule* no, it's war, they could care less.
avatar
Shockwave
Potential World Power

Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Fri Feb 27, 2015 2:59 am

Muchos Estados Unidos wrote:I am asking WASC to ban Xolox from Security Council because of his declaration of war. He do not deserve to be in WASC, he is a plain war maker. He is even involved recently with a fight with Scouting over the Vice President seat.


This resolution may now be debated and voted on for 5 days.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Fri Feb 27, 2015 2:59 am

Scouting is Against.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Shockwave on Fri Feb 27, 2015 4:43 am

Wirbanskia is Against
avatar
Shockwave
Potential World Power

Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Serenarea on Fri Feb 27, 2015 6:04 am

Serenarea is AGAINST.
avatar
Serenarea
Powerbroker

Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Snarfian Federation on Fri Feb 27, 2015 6:53 am

Against
avatar
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

Eurussian Vote

Post  Great Eurussia on Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:31 pm

Eurussia abstains.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  New Rhodinia on Fri Feb 27, 2015 11:31 pm

New Rhodinia is also against this. First, Xolox is indeed not on the WASC so this ban from the WASC is entirely pointless already. Second, from what I can see, this is another reactionary response to Xolox's attack in an attempt to undermine his political presence. Just because a nation declares war on you, doesn't mean you can vote to take away all of their political freedoms in the World Alliance.
avatar
New Rhodinia
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 324
Join date : 2014-09-22

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  DPRNK on Sun Mar 01, 2015 11:22 am

FOR
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Kingdom of Scottlands on Sun Mar 01, 2015 3:50 pm

Scottish Republic will abstain because of our neutrality.
avatar
Kingdom of Scottlands
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 314
Join date : 2014-10-07

Back to top Go down

NOTICE

Post  UnitedStatesOfScouting on Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:04 pm

With an overwhelming amount of against votes, it's clear that this resolution failed. Dismissed.
avatar
UnitedStatesOfScouting
Emerging Power

Posts : 970
Join date : 2014-11-03

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=scouting

Back to top Go down

Re: (Dismissed) Request for WASC Ban of Xolox

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum