(Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  DPRNK on Wed Mar 25, 2015 11:07 am

I want you to read this verdict since Wirbanskia is also guilty as part of this case. 
http://worldalliance.postalboard.com/t758p60-resolved-new-korrea-vs-artite#28448
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  Shockwave on Wed Mar 25, 2015 9:31 pm

I am not part of that case because it does not involve me, if it did, I was not made aware therefore I was not given any opportunity to defend myself.
avatar
Shockwave
Potential World Power

Posts : 527
Join date : 2014-12-02

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  Ebsotz on Fri Mar 27, 2015 11:18 am

Wirbanskia's Actions Against Ebsotz:

I forgive Wirbanskia for all of his deeds. I still want him as a friend, as an ally.

But unfortunately I cannot change the tide of this case.
avatar
Ebsotz
Powerbroker

Posts : 297
Join date : 2014-10-07
Location : Southern California

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=ebsotz

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  Snarfian Federation on Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:40 am

i had to hink very long over this decision but i think i will go with Favor
avatar
Snarfian Federation
Regional Power

Posts : 413
Join date : 2013-07-21
Location : Somewhere in a galaxy far far away...

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  DPRNK on Sat Mar 28, 2015 5:57 am

Wirbanskia wrote:I am not part of that case because it does not involve me, if it did, I was not made aware therefore I was not given any opportunity to defend myself.

Face the guilty verdict than making lies that you arrest President Leem that is impossible.
avatar
DPRNK
Regional Power

Posts : 419
Join date : 2014-09-17

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  Serenarea on Sat Mar 28, 2015 7:04 am

Serenarea is in FAVOR
avatar
Serenarea
Powerbroker

Posts : 179
Join date : 2014-09-03

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  Muchos Estados Unidos on Sat Mar 28, 2015 9:04 am

MEU is in favor. I know my ally Wirbanskia is responsible to correct his mistakes and I believe he does not intend to act like imperialist. But I hope this war will teach us a lesson that taking lands from other countries is not the solution to problems of countries.
avatar
Muchos Estados Unidos
Emerging Regional Power

Posts : 391
Join date : 2014-09-04

Back to top Go down

Official Verdict

Post  Great Eurussia on Sat Mar 28, 2015 2:26 pm

Great Eurussia wrote:CHARGES:

  • Wirbanskia declared war on New Korrea and MEU bringing death and damages
  • Wirbanskia declared war on Ebsotz
  • Wirbanskia illegally invaded New Korrea
  • Wirbanskia must be punished accordingly as request by New Korrea
  • New Korrea asks to declare the proposed Treaty of Wirbanskia, illegal
  • New Korrea cited the verdict of the case: NK vs Artite against Wirbanskia


MOTION:

  • Wirbanskia admitted to have declared war on Ebsotz, MEU, and New Korrea.
  • Wirbanskia declared war with justifications except of that of with MEU.
  • Wirbanskia admitted to have invaded Ebsotz due to threat to unspecified coalition forces. But will not provide any compensation towards Ebsotz.
  • Wirbanskia admitted to have invaded New Korrea due to threat to its unspecified allies.
  • But will not provide any compensation and land relinquishment towards New Korrea.


CONCLUSION:

  • The Empire of Wirbanskia, based on the evidences provided by New Korrea and as well as its own arguments AND admission, is found guilty of violations of the World Alliance Security Council Act, which is the basic law of the World Alliance and its very fundamental law, particularly the sovereign rights of the Republic of New Korrea and the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos, namely the right to sovereignty. Due to its armed attacks on the sovereign territories of the Republic of New Korrea and Muchos Estados Unidos.
  • The Empire of Wirbanskia, based on the evidences provided by New Korrea and as well as its own arguments AND admission, is found guilty of declaring war on the Empire of Ebsotz. However, there is no sufficient evidence to the effect of causing harm or damage through armed attacks on the sovereign territories of the Empire of Ebsotz. By its own admission, the Empire of Wirbanskia made an invasion against the Empire of Ebsotz.
  • The Empire of Wirbanskia, based on the evidences provided by New Korrea and as well as its own arguments AND admission, is found guilty of violations of the World Alliance Security Council Act, which is the basic law of the World Alliance and its very fundamental law, particularly the sovereign rights of the Republic of New Korrea, namely the right to exist, the right to independence, and the right to self determination. Due to its armed attacks on the sovereign territories of New Korrea. Thus, the presence of the forces of Wirbanskia over any part of New Korrea, and any form of exercise of its jurisdiction or authority over any part of New Korrea, without the explicit consent and recognition of the sovereign government of the Republic of New Korrea, is illegal.
  • The alleged proposed Treaty of the Empire of Wirbanskia towards the Republic of New Korrea cannot be declared illegal as there is insufficient evidence to that effect.
  • The case (New Korrea vs Artite) as cited by the Republic of New Korrea is rejected by this honourable council on the basis that it remains a non-resolved case and currently pending for resolution by the Security Council. Thus, cannot be cited yet to support the case of the Republic of New Korrea against the Empire of Wirbanskia.
  • The Empire of Wirbanskia remains accountable to all its actions, as specified on this ruling, against the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos and the Empire of Ebsotz as there is no sufficient evidence that the two nations have made actions towards the Empire of Wirbanskia that could justify its actions as self defense against the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos and the Empire of Ebsotz.
  • The Empire of Wirbanskia remains accountable to all its actions, as specified on this ruling, against the Republic of New Korrea as there is no sufficient evidence that the said nation has made action towards the Empire of Wirbanskia that could justify its actions as self defense against the Republic of New Korrea. Furthermore, based on its own admission, the Republic of New Korrea only posed a threat towards the unspecified allies of the Empire of Wirbanskia and not the country itself. 


RECOMMENDATION:

  • The Empire of Wirbanskia is hereby ordered by this honourable council to ensure the return of the status quo in the Republic of New Korrea, the Unites States of Muchos Estados Unidos, and the Empire of Ebsotz, prior to its declaration of war and invasion against the aforementioned sovereign states.
  • The Empire of Wirbanskia is hereby advised by this honourable council to compensate for the any damages it caused towards the Republic of New Korrea, the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos, and the Empire of Ebsotz for whatever amount that may be agreed by Parties involved through mutual bilateral agreement or for whatever amount that may be agreed by Parties involved through the assistance of the Security Council, if Parties involved request of such.
  • Please be informed that due to the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos, not being an official Party to this case, as it was not invited by any Party nor invoked its rights not to be involved in the proceedings, any order or advise towards or coming from the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos is only for representation purposes and is not legally binding towards or coming from the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos.
  • Please be informed that due to the Empire of Ebsotz, not being an official Party to this case, as it was not invited by any Party nor invoked its rights not to be involved in the proceedings, any order or advise towards or coming from the Empire of Ebsotz is only for representation purposes and is not legally binding towards or coming from the Empire of Ebsotz.
  • The Empire of Wirbanskia is not entitled to any sovereign territory it acquired or obtained through illegal actions, as specified on this ruling, in the Republic of New Korrea, the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos, and the Empire of Ebsotz. Thus, the order to return the status quo in the said sovereign states, prior to its declaration of war and invasion against the aforementioned sovereign states, must be returned to their original state. Furthermore, there is no sufficient evidence to the effect that the Republic of New Korrea, the United States of Muchos Estados Unidos, and the Empire of Ebsotz have made any form of relinquishment nor recognition of any of their sovereign territory in favor of the Empire of Wirbanskia.




THEREFORE, this office hereby recommends, with finality, this ruling to the Security Council.
Member States, duly qualified, may now vote on the ruling within three (3) days.

* Involved Parties that are SC Members are disqualified to vote.
* Secondary seat holders of the SC are not qualified to vote.

Thank you.

With four nations voting unanimously, the official verdict is now in full effectivity.

So ordered.
avatar
Great Eurussia
Superpower

Posts : 5336
Join date : 2013-02-04

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=great_eurussia

Back to top Go down

Re: (Resolved) New Korrea vs Wirbanskia

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum